- The Midas Report
- Posts
- AI Is Reshaping Power at Work and Your New Boss Is an Algorithm
AI Is Reshaping Power at Work and Your New Boss Is an Algorithm
4 min read.
Midas AI
August 07, 2025
Artificial intelligence is not just changing what companies build. It is changing how they are built. For years, technologists predicted that AI would automate routine tasks.
Now that vision is colliding with corporate reality. Companies are beginning to replace not only administrative functions but also knowledge workers and middle managers with increasingly capable AI systems. The result is a flattening of traditional hierarchies that many business leaders are only starting to prepare for.
Recent reporting from Fortune highlights a growing trend, AI “agents” are quietly taking on decision making roles that once required layers of human oversight. From onboarding new employees to managing supply chains, these autonomous systems don’t just assist human staff, in many cases, they are replacing them. Unlike human workers, AI agents don’t care about rank, reporting lines, or departmental silos. They operate horizontally across teams, guided purely by access, data, and defined objectives.
Middle Management, Meet Your Replacement
While AI tools have long helped individual contributors become more productive, the newest wave is targeting middle management, often thought of as the connective tissue in traditional organizations. These roles, historically responsible for supervising projects, aggregating updates, and forwarding decisions up the chain, are now proving vulnerable to automation.
The rise of “multi agent workflows,” where interconnected AI systems coordinate with each other to execute tasks, is particularly disruptive. Instead of a human directing progress, companies like Adept and Cognosys are designing platforms where appointed AI agents serve as process owners. These agents can generate memos, approve marketing budgets, or even restructure project timelines based on live data.
This shift is not theoretical. Researchers and early adopters of these systems have reported measurable gains in speed and efficiency. Removing middle layers speeds up decision cycles and reduces coordination overhead. The payoff is especially potent in fast moving sectors such as software, logistics, and financial services.
The New Flat Organization
The implications reach beyond which jobs go away. AI integration is changing the shape of organizations themselves. Instead of tiered reporting structures, more firms are experimenting with flat, modular setups where teams operate independently but are supported by AI agents that interface across domains.
This reconfiguration appeals to startups and lean operators who prize agility. With less bureaucracy, ideas can move from concept to deployment faster. AI agents don’t need permission from a VP before implementing a product change if they have sufficient data and goals to act on. In practice, this lets smaller teams compete with larger, slower incumbents.
It also hints at a realpolitik shake up. Business leaders who continue to treat org charts as sacred may find themselves outpaced by those who optimize for machine compatibility rather than hierarchy. According to AI researchers quoted in Fortune, companies anchored in legacy reporting structures will increasingly suffer from slower performance, not merely because they're behind on AI tools, but because they are organized in ways incompatible with the tools’ capabilities.
People Still Matter, Just Differently
None of this means that humans are obsolete. Instead, roles are evolving. In a flatter, AI mediated workplace, value shifts toward those who can orchestrate systems, define metrics, and intervene with judgment when algorithms fail. Leadership becomes less about directing people and more about configuring processes, and maintaining accountability for outcomes driven by machine agents.
At the edges of this movement are also cautionary signs. Public figures like the UK’s first AI generated Member of Parliament, “AI Steve,” created by businessman Steve Endacott, reflect both the novelty and the limits of agent based reasoning in civic life. AI Steve was “elected” to serve through an open platform, responding to questions and drafting policies with public input. Still, critics warn that such figures risk bypassing the messy, essential negotiations of human governance.
In business, the message is similar. AI agents are powerful facilitators, but decisions with complex trade offs still require human ownership. Flattening organizations doesn't mean eliminating responsibility. It means moving from command and control to configure and monitor.
The Strategic Cost of Organizational Lag
For business operators, the key takeaway is not that AI is replacing everyone. It is that organizational design must adapt alongside technical adoption. Installing chatbots and process automation is not enough. If corporate structure remains bloated or misaligned, performance will lag.
Firms that ignore this risk ceding market position to more responsive competitors. As artificial intelligence continues to blur lines between roles and automate knowledge work, the most forward-looking teams will be those that rethink not only the tools they use, but how they work together. In the age of AI agents, speed scales with structure.