Today was a clean reminder that AI is not a single trade, it is a stack. Intel showed what happens when you promise an AI comeback and deliver a soft forecast. Meanwhile TSMC and ASML kept looking like the toll collectors of the entire AI arms race. In crypto, listings and presale hype tried to front run real adoption.

Intel’s stock took the hit after a cautious outlook underscored the uncomfortable truth. Not every legacy chip giant gets to print money just because the word AI is in the earnings deck. The market is rewarding execution and capacity, not ambition. Intel’s stumble matters because it highlights where the AI value pool is concentrating. The winners are the companies that already sit inside the buildout, shipping the picks and shovels that hyperscalers actually need this quarter, not next decade.

That is why TSMC keeps getting framed as the highest conviction AI play in public markets. In an AI arms race, the foundry wins because everyone shows up at the same factory door. Nvidia, AMD, Apple, and the next wave of custom silicon builders do not scale without leading edge nodes and packaging capacity, and TSMC is the choke point. Investors are basically paying for the privilege of owning the infrastructure that the entire model economy runs on.

ASML sits one step upstream and the setup is similar. A rich valuation only looks rich until you remember there is no serious leading edge manufacturing ramp without EUV tools. Demand can wobble around the edges, but the strategic direction is one way. More compute, more wafers, more tools. The broader bubble chatter is getting louder again, with dot com comparisons floating around, but the key difference is that AI has a visible revenue engine already. Cloud spend and enterprise deployments are real, even if some multiples are not.

💸 Funding Watch 💸

The startup tape is sending a blunt signal. The market is splitting into two buckets.

There are companies raising enormous rounds because they sit close to distribution or infrastructure, and everyone else fighting for oxygen with smaller checks and tougher terms. Lists of 2025 mega rounds show a recurring pattern. Investors were willing to write nine figure tickets for teams building model tooling, developer platforms, data infrastructure, and vertical AI products with clear ROI paths. The theme is not novelty. It is adoption.

The Replit founder’s ongoing messaging in the ecosystem captures the mood. AI is turning product development into a speed contest, and the winners are the ones that can ship faster, onboard users faster, and compound iteration. That sounds inspiring until you look at the other side of the trade. Talent markets are getting sharper, with more people effectively locked into roles while others get cut loose. It is not just cost trimming. It is companies reallocating toward AI native output and away from work that does not scale.

One underappreciated thread is how deeply AI is reshaping financial plumbing. AI driven lending and capital markets workflows are moving from experimental to operational, because when margins compress, automation stops being a nice to have. That links directly back to the public market winners. When enterprises industrialize AI, they buy compute, they buy tooling, and they buy the chips that make it all possible. The startup world is racing to capture the workflow layer, while the public market supply chain keeps collecting rent.

🪙 Crypto Moves 🪙

Crypto AI was in its usual split personality mode today. On one side you have legit exchange activity where listings act like jet fuel. The ELSA listing on Upbit drew attention because Upbit liquidity can turn a quiet token into a full blown momentum trade overnight. Listings are not fundamentals, but they are a distribution event, and traders treat them like an earnings surprise. On the other side you have the presale machine pushing another wave of AI branded tokens, with DeepSnitch AI grabbing headlines and the usual narrative that smart money is loading up. That may move price, but it does not automatically create a product.

Sentient also popped up again in the prediction industrial complex, with multi year price forecasts making the rounds. This is where builders and investors should stay disciplined. Price predictions are entertainment unless they tie back to usage, revenue, or at least measurable network demand. The real signal is whether these projects are integrating into developer workflows, compute marketplaces, inference networks, or data pipelines that actual teams rely on.

The connective tissue to today’s equity story is simple. The market is paying for infrastructure. In stocks, it is fabs and lithography. In crypto, the only AI tokens that deserve durable attention are the ones that create credible infrastructure, not just a ticker. The next leg of crypto AI will not be won by louder marketing. It will be won by projects that make inference cheaper, data more available, or coordination easier in a way Web2 cannot easily replicate.

📊 Stay tuned for tomorrow’s MarketPulse and sign up to our daily Midas Report newsletter.

Keep Reading

No posts found