- The Midas Report
- Posts
- The Energy Surge, the Talent Lag, and the Claude Conundrum
The Energy Surge, the Talent Lag, and the Claude Conundrum

Another day, another round of AI reshaping the fundamentals, from how we power cities to how we structure teams. Today’s highlights include a warning shot on looming electricity demands, a fast growing legal AI unicorn, and what the data says about where (and how) Claude is actually being used. Let’s dive in.
AI is powering up and straining the grid
The U.S. grid could need a 25% boost in output just to keep up with AI.
At a recent industry roundtable hosted by Broadband Breakfast, infrastructure experts dropped a striking forecast, AI related energy demand is set to vault from niche stressor to serious grid disruptor. As next gen data centers ramp up for AI training and inference, U.S. electricity production may need to rise by 25% over just five years.
This isn’t hypothetical. AWS alone expects a 4x increase in its energy use, from 3 gigawatts today to 12 gigawatts. By 2035, data centers are predicted to consume 8.6% of the entire U.S. grid’s output, up from 3.5% right now. That’s not just unusually fast, as INCOMPAS CEO Chip Pickering put it, the grid hasn’t had to scale like this in forty years.
AI native founders and operators shouldn’t overlook this tailwind. Not just because it affects data center siting and vendor costs, but because energy has quietly become a competitive lever. Rural states like Texas, Mississippi, and Tennessee are emerging as hotspots for AI infrastructure thanks to energy proximity and friendlier permitting.
It also means energy strategy, historically an ops concern, is now firmly boardroom territory for AI scale ups.
Your AI adoption is outpacing your org chart
BCG says AI tools are flooding workflows faster than companies can restructure around them.
In a new report, complete with a pseudo Marvel verse of org archetypes, Boston Consulting Group issued a strategic warning, many businesses are adopting AI tools tactically, without aligning talent models or operating structures. The result? Misaligned teams, mismatched hiring, and underwhelming ROI.
BCG introduces four archetypes of AI integration, the Scaler (embedding AI in existing workflows), the Horizon Builder (retraining internally), the Streamliner (collapsing roles), and the Reinventor (rebuilding orgs end to end). But across all four, the consistent theme is this, AI is flattening hierarchies, blending roles, and rewriting how work gets done.
In some tech teams, autonomous agents now handle the coordination layer, allowing a single PM to manage 4 to 6x the scope they used to. AI knowledge is becoming essential in onboarding, grads need more than a CS degree, they need prompt engineering, quality tuning, and contextual judgment skills.
For consulting firms and forward leaning HR leaders, this isn’t just a challenge, it’s an opportunity. There’s a land grab underway for who can best help companies architect their AI native operating model.
A $10B content economy is (still) just getting started
AI writing tools are set to hit $10.3 billion in market size by 2032, and we’re barely scratching the surface.
According to Credence Research, the global AI writing assistant market will grow nearly 25% annually through 2032. That’s good news for the likes of Grammarly, Notion, Jasper, and Microsoft Copilot, but even better news for the long tail of plug ins, APIs, and hyper specific tools that can still ride this wave.
Regions like Asia Pacific and Latin America are expected to drive much of the upside, where local language support and cultural customization remain underdeveloped niches. On the enterprise side, integration is emerging as the true unlock, the more tightly writing tools embed into CRMs, CMSs, and workflow software, the higher their stickiness.
Also worth noting, regulated industries want in, but need trust layers. Tools offering hybrid deployments or compliance focused features (think legal drafting, academic editing, or financial disclosures) are positioned to win outsized share as the market matures.
Anthropic’s new report shows where (and how) AI is actually being used
Claude may be fluent, but usage is far from evenly distributed.
Anthropic’s third AI Economic Index just dropped, with a granular breakdown of where Claude usage is highest, and what that says about enterprise deployment maturity. Perhaps unsurprisingly, developed countries dominate, Israel, Singapore, and the U.S. lead in per capita usage, while major economies like India and Nigeria lag behind.
What’s more telling is the usage intent. In high usage regions, Claude is used across a range of tasks, education, research, writing. In low usage countries, it’s almost entirely focused on code generation. That suggests an earlier maturity curve, companies are starting with productivity gains before branching into creative or analytical domains.
Anthropic’s data also reveals something refreshing, enterprise users show weak price sensitivity. Even though tasks like software automation cost more per token, usage remains high. The constraint isn’t cost, it’s context delivery. Organizations that can feed their AI high quality data structures (APIs, task flows, metadata) see better ROI.
For go to market leaders, this report is a goldmine, highlighting where the install base is fertile for vertical expansions and where enablement requires more foundational work.
Vertical AI strikes again as Harvey hits $5B
Legal tech just got its own AI unicorn plus, and it started with a junior associate who had enough.
Harvey, the legal AI company co founded by Winston Weinberg, is now worth over $5 billion after rapid traction in serving law firms and in house counsels with LLM powered assistants. While concrete financials are light, the trajectory says plenty, SaaS like ramp, sector specific GTM, and a decisive vertical focus.
Law, like healthcare and finance, checks the AI sweet spot, high regulation, high text, and operational complexity. Tools like Harvey aren’t generalist copilots; they’re domain native platforms trained on deep legal workflows and internal precedent.
If you’re building vertical AI, Harvey's rise is a beacon. There’s still blue ocean in building truly context aware agents, especially when “copilot” isn't enough and precision is non negotiable.
Closing thoughts
As investors crane their necks toward the peaks of AI adoption, today's stories remind us that progress isn’t just about faster models or cooler demos, it’s about infrastructure, labor design, geopolitics, and niche execution.
Whether you're managing a talent realignment, choosing where to build your next data center, or weighing go to market bets for your GPT powered side hustle, the AI terrain is only getting more multidimensional.
More tomorrow,
– Aura