- The Midas Report
- Posts
- What a Medical Study Teaches About Enterprise AI
What a Medical Study Teaches About Enterprise AI
3 min read.
A reported 20 percent performance drop after removing AI assistance shows why value accrues to teams that own workflow context, not just the model.
Bloomberg reported on August 12, 2025, that a study found AI assistance helped health professionals better detect pre cancerous growths in the colon. When the AI tool was later removed, doctors’ ability to find tumors dropped by about 20 percent compared with rates before the AI tool was introduced. The findings were published on a Wednesday.
The study also reported that some doctors lost skills after just a few months of using the tool. On its face, this looks like a cautionary tale about overreliance. Look closer and it reads like an operations memo for anyone deploying AI in the enterprise. The real leverage is not the model alone. It is the workflow context you build around it.
When AI Reshapes the Process
The study’s arc is familiar. A tool improves outcomes. Teams adapt to the tool. Remove the tool and performance dips below the original baseline. That pattern tells us the AI did more than generate suggestions. It rewired the surrounding process.
The AI shaped where attention went, how decisions were sequenced, and what signals mattered. In other words, it mediated context. Once that mediation disappeared, users were left with habits and expectations that no longer matched the original workflow. The result was a measurable drop in capability.
For builders, this is the difference between bolting an assistant onto a process and embedding AI in the process pipes. If the assistant is a surface layer that captures context implicitly, your organization becomes dependent on that thin interface. When it is switched off or swapped out, the loss is not just a missing feature. It is a missing scaffold for attention and judgment.
The study’s 20 percent decline quantifies that hidden cost. It also surfaces the risk of unowned context. If the way your teams perceive and act is now routed through a tool you do not control, you do not control the value layer.
Designing for Durable Context
Owning the value layer means owning how context is captured, structured, and delivered to models and humans alike. In the study, AI assistance improved detection. That shows the upside of better context delivery in high-stakes tasks. It also shows the fragility that comes when that delivery is externalized and temporary.
Enterprises should design workflows where context flows are explicit and tool agnostic. That allows different models to be swapped in without tearing the fabric of how work gets done. It also creates a path for graceful degradation. If one tool is removed, the upstream context remains available and the process does not collapse below baseline.
There is another lesson in the finding that some doctors lost skills after just a few months of using the tool. If you place critical perception and decision steps entirely inside an assistant, human proficiency atrophies. That is not an argument against assistance. It is a design requirement.
Keep humans in the loop in a way that preserves expertise rather than replaces it. Route the right signals to people and make their judgment a first class part of the system. When the model is unavailable, the human network should still have the context to perform. That implies investing in training and feedback that mirrors the assisted workflow, not a separate world that only exists when the tool is turned off.
Strategic Takeaway
AI that improves outcomes without eroding resilience is built upstream. Where your data lands, how tasks are orchestrated, and how humans and models share attention is where durable value lives.
The study underscores the costs of treating AI as a detachable overlay. It also underscores the gains when assistance is tuned to the domain and fused with the workflow in a way you can govern. Control the context and you can change models, vendors, and interfaces without losing your edge. Lose the context and even a temporary outage can set you back below where you started.
AI can lift performance quickly, as the reported improvement in detecting pre cancerous growths makes clear. But the 20 percent drop after removal is the bill for context you did not own. If you want enterprise AI that compounds rather than decays, build for context control first and let the model be a replaceable part, not the foundation.